Laptop Survey – Final results are in

Here are the final results of my 1-1 laptop program survey. If you’ve watched this blog, you probably noticed I published preliminary results a while back with no commentary. I began the survey on the advice of Pamela Livingston. After 7 years of laptops for students, my school was looking for information to remodel/revise their program. Pamela’s suggestion yielded information I hope will be valuable to other institutions as well.

I have to thank the many people who accessed and/or forwarded the survey (65 accessed the survey, and about 61 completed it). It was especially cool to see responses from so many places around the world – Australia, Germany, Taiwan, Canada, China, UK About 70% were from independent or other private schools; the remaining were primarily from public schools/districts.

A few points worthy of note:

General trends:

Access by grade: K-3 – Stationary labs, 4-8 – Carts/mobile labs, 7-12 – 1-1 laptops

Replacement of laptops occurs every 3-4 years, usually depending on the hardware warranty and/or lease. Most require extended warranties (3+ years).

Some big questions I’m thinking about…

I noticed a number of schools with 1-1 access in specific classrooms or just during the school day. Some programs use the 24:7 nature of 1-1 as a selling point; others seem concerned about the amount of time kids spend with technology and prefer not to extend it beyond the school day. At what point is the laptop an asset beyond the school day? The common start point seems to be upper elementary to middle school. I’m curious whether this is more of an adult issue – when the school is ready to do intensive integration – or a developmental one.

A number of schools have laptop program models which are either optional family purchase and/or have choice of platform. As someone who’s taught in a 1-1 Mac school and in a 1-1 PC school, I can’t imagine laptop-optional or mixed-platform being very effective models for significant integration. I know I could teach in a mixed-platform classroom, but the level of integration, beyond using web-based tools, would be lower than in a classroom with like platform access. (Note: The MacBook with dual boot would likely bridge the gap pretty well.)

IMHO, one of the greatest benefits of a true 1-1 program is that all students start with the same essential tool. As a teacher, I know all of my students have a word processing/spreadsheet/presentation suite and audio/video editing capability when they come into my classroom. All students can access a file I share, either via the Internet or via school networks. Any web-based resource is equally available to all students. Be the school public or private, it’s our duty to the students to start them on as level a playing field as possible and give them the support we can to get them as far as they’re willing and/or able to go.

Questions I wish I’d thought to ask:

So, with all of this in mind, what does your ideal 1-1 program look like?  Jim Heyndericjkx asked just that…  Here are the results of his survey last summer.

Did you enjoy this post? Why not leave a comment below and continue the conversation, or subscribe to my feed and get articles like this delivered automatically to your feed reader.

Comments

No comments yet.

Leave a comment

(required)

(required)


*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word